Draft as of 1.4.2011
Title 14
Adequate Public Facilities
Chapter: 14.04 Adequate Public Facilities
§14.04.010. Title.
This chapter shall be known and cited as the "Adequate
Public Facilities Ordinance of the Town of Emmitsburg,
Maryland.
§14.04.020.
Authority.
This chapter is established in accordance with the
provisions of Md. Code Ann., Art. 66B.
§14.04.030.
Jurisdiction. The provisions of this chapter shall
apply to all lands within the territorial limits of the
town.
§14.04.040.
Intent
This chapter is adopted with the intent that new
residential, commercial, industrial and other development
take place in accordance with the Town of Emmitsburg
Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvements Program
and to ensure that adequate public facilities and services
are available concurrent with new development so that
orderly development and growth can occur. Provision of
adequate facilities will take place in cooperation with
Frederick County and the State of Maryland when these
facilities are beyond the jurisdiction of the town
government. For purposes of this chapter, public
facilities shall include road, water, sewerage, fire and
emergency medical services, and school facilities.
§14.04.050. Definitions
In this chapter, the following terms are used as
defined unless otherwise apparent from the content.
Adequate
Public Facilities (APF). Those public facilities
included in the context of this chapter which meet
established minimum standards as further specified herein.
Capital
Improvement Program (CIP). An annual document adopted
by the Town, indicating capital projects having funding
approval for the current fiscal year and those capital
projects which are currently planned for the following 5
year period, including the proposed means of financing the
same.
Comprehensive
Plan. The plan adopted by the Board of Commissioners
to guide the development of the town, including maps and
text, and any changes or additions thereto made under the
provisions of MD Code Ann., Art. 66B.
Level of
Service (LOS). A standardized index of relative
service as defined in the "Highway Capacity Manual"
published by the Transportation Research Board.
Senior Housing.
Any project that meets the qualifications as defined in
§17.04.020 of the Town Code, and restricts occupancy to
persons 62 years of age and older, in keeping with the
Fair Housing Act requirements for exemptions from the
prohibition against familial status discrimination, such
that children will be excluded as residents.
§14.04.060.
General Requirements
(A) In planning and developing any subdivision or any
development, the developer shall comply with the general
principles set forth in this chapter for the provision of
adequate facilities; and in every case the developer shall
observe the procedure outlined in this chapter.
(B) A developer shall not avoid the intent of this
chapter by submitting piecemeal applications for
preliminary plats or site plans. However, a developer may
seek approval of only a portion of the subdivision or
development, provided that the impact from all previously
approved preliminaries or site plans from that development
shall be considered during the APF review of each
subsequent portion of the development.
(C) Except as provided in §14.04.070, all parcels
must receive APFO approval prior to preliminary or final
subdivision or site plan approval.
§14.04.070. Exemptions.
(A) Public safety facilities are not subject to the
requirements of this chapter. Except as specifically
provided in this section, all other applications for
development, whether for State, County or Town facilities,
or private sector projects, are required to obtain APFO
approval.
(B) Any existing preliminary subdivision plat
approved prior to January 1, 2011 shall be exempt from the
requirements of this chapter for the following time
periods as long as the preliminary approval remains valid:
(1) Residential
development with valid preliminary approval 3 years from
January 1, 2011
(2) Nonresidential development with valid preliminary
approval 3 years from January 1, 2011
(C) Senior
housing exemption from schools requirement. Any project
which qualifies as "senior housing" as defined in
§17.04.020 of the Town Code, and restricts occupancy to
persons 62 years of age and older, in keeping with the
Fair Housing Act requirements for exemptions from the
prohibition against familial status discrimination, such
that children will be excluded as residents, is exempt
from the APFO schools requirement. The project must meet
all other APFO requirements and,
(1) The zoning
certificate, site plan and subdivision approvals shall
limit occupancy of the property to persons age 62 and
older as specified in the Fair Housing Act, as described
in Section (C), above.
(2) Before any revision or modification to the project
at any time in the future, whether the project is built
out and occupied or not, which has the effect of
removing or substantially modifying the age restriction
for residents, the project must first comply with the
schools adequacy requirements under this chapter.
(3) Any project approved under this section shall meet
the requirements of the sections of this chapter
requiring that roads, public water and sewerage
facilities be adequate.
§14.04.080 Approval of Subdivisions, Site Plans.
(A)
All residential subdivisions, commercial/industrial
subdivisions, site plans, and revised subdivisions or site
plans resulting in an increase in density or intensity of
use, received for approval, re-approval or extension by
the Planning Commission shall meet the requirements set
forth herein prior to preliminary plat or site plan
approval, except as provided for in §14.01.070.
(B) Subdivision plats or site plans that do not
meet the requirements for adequate public facilities set
forth herein shall not be granted preliminary subdivision
or site plan approval by the Planning Commission. A
conditional approval as allowed for in §14.01.090 may be
granted, provided no final approval shall be granted or
lots recorded until the conditions set forth in the
conditional approval have been satisfied.
(C) Prior to the signing of any preliminary plat,
or site plan, an adequate public facilities letter of
understanding shall be forwarded to the Planning
Commission and to the developer by the Town Manager.
(D) Approval of adequate public facilities as set
forth in this chapter shall be valid from the date of the
meeting at which approval of the preliminary subdivision
or site plan approval is first granted by the Planning
Commission for the following time period as long as the
preliminary plan or site plan approval remains valid.
(1) Residential
subdivisions – 3 years
(2) Nonresidential subdivisions – 3 years
(E) If the
preliminary plan or site plan approval expires or is
voided prior to the recording of all lots, the unrecorded
lots or in the case of site plans, unconstructed portion
of the development, shall meet the requirements of this
chapter prior to again obtaining preliminary subdivision
or site plan approval.
§14.04.090
Conditional Approval.
(A) Conditional site plan, or preliminary plat,
approval maybe granted to a development that does not have
adequate public facilities at the time of Planning
Commission consideration, provided that the developer
agrees to provide the necessary improvements to make the
facility adequate as allowed for in §14.04.100. If the
developer improvements will not result in adequate
capacity, conditional approval shall not be granted, and
preliminary plat and site plan approval shall be denied.
(B) If any conditions of a preliminary plat
approval have not been met, then approval shall not be
granted to a final subdivision plat.
(C) If conditional site plan approval has been
granted, a building permit shall not be issued until the
conditions have been satisfied, or the facilities have
been determined to be adequate.
§14.04.100
Developer Option
The
developer shall have the option to provide the public
facility improvements necessary to support the proposed
development and to ensure adequacy of public facilities as
set forth in this chapter or wait for public facilities to
become adequate by improvements made pursuant to the CIP
or other sources. A county, state or municipal agency may
participate in the improvements.
§14.04.110
Administration The Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance shall be administered by the Town Planning
Office. All applications, maps, and documents relative to
subdivision or site plan approval and subject to the
provisions of this chapter shall be submitted to the
Planning Office, which will review all information and
present the relevant information and its recommendations
to the Planning Commission. Final determination of
adequacy shall be the responsibility of the Planning
Commission.
§14.04.112
Referral to other agencies/Public Comment.
(A) The Planning Office may refer the subdivision,
site and development plans, to any County, State, or other
agency it deems appropriate for review, comments and/or
recommendations pertaining to the adequacy of public
facilities, and these recommendations shall be considered
by the Planning Commission in making its decision. (B)
The Planning Commission shall accept public comments and
consider these comments as part of the record in its
decision making process.
§14.04.120
Appeals.
(A) Any person aggrieved by any action of the Planning
Commission pursuant to this chapter may appeal to the
Circuit Court pursuant to Maryland Rules, Title 7, Chapter
200. The decision of the Circuit Court may be appealed to
the Court of Special Appeals, or, upon certiorari, to the
Court of Appeals of Maryland in accordance with Maryland
Rules. (B) The Town Council may file a responsive
pleading and be a party to or take an appeal to the
Circuit Court of the county, to the Court of Special
Appeals of Maryland, or upon certiorari, to the Court of
Appeals of Maryland of any decision made under this
chapter.
§14.04.130
Fees The Town of Emmitsburg Board of Commissioners
shall have the authority to establish by resolution fees
for APFO-related services. This may include, but shall not
be limited to, a base review fee, plus any additional
costs incurred for professional review services.
§14.04.140 Determination of Adequacy
(A) Roads. For development applications that will
increase traffic loads over existing levels as determined
by Maryland State Highway Administration traffic counts by
25% or greater, based on the latest edition of the ITE
"Trip Generation Manual", a traffic impact analysis (TIA)
shall be prepared. Study area and/or scope of study shall
be determined by Town Staff.
(1) If the
existing road facilities are determined to be inadequate
to accommodate the traffic flow projected by the TIA,
the preliminary plan or site plan approval shall be
denied, except as provided in §14.04.090.
(2) Road improvements necessary to mitigate inadequacies
shall be determined by the Town staff, and/or their
agents and consultants, after reviewing the entire
record, including the TIA, road rating system, traffic
management plan (if required), safety considerations and
the Maryland SHA comments; and improvements may be
provided by the developer as prescribed in 14.04.100.
(B) Public
Water Supply. For development applications that will
require additional water supply beyond what is existing on
the site, the proposed capacity usage will be evaluated
relative to the existing available units of capacity
(taps) and any anticipated expansion of capacity pursuant
to the Capital Improvement Plan and water management plan.
The water capacity shall be considered adequate if, given
existing connections, future connections from buildings
under construction, recorded lots for which allocations
have been made and multi-year tap agreements:
(1) The source
facilities, storage tanks and local pumping stations
have sufficient available capacity to provide maximum
day demand and fire flow to the proposed development
(2) The distribution system is capable of providing
normal required pressure as well as minimal residual
pressure to the proposed development. It should be noted
that water taps are not guaranteed for the project until
such taps are purchased, or a multi-year tap agreement
has been executed between the town and developer.
(3) Water supply capacity (taps) will be allocated
according to a plan developed by town staff that will
assign the number of taps and a time frame in which to
use them.
(4) If water supply capacity is found to be inadequate,
preliminary subdivision and/or site plan application
shall be denied except as provided for in §14.04.090.
(5) Improvements necessary to achieving the required
capacity shall be determined by the town staff and may
be provided by the developer as allowed in §14.04.090.
(6) Upon completion of construction of APFO water system
improvements for a development the APFO water capacity
approval shall be vested for the capacity created by the
improvements and shall not be subject to further APFO
water capacity testing unless the density or intensity
of the development increases.
(C) Public
Sewer Capacity. For development applications that will
require sewer capacity in addition to that which is
existing on the site, the proposed capacity usage will be
evaluated relative to the existing available units of
treatment capacity at the Wastewater Treatment Facility on
Creamery Road. It should be noted that sewer taps are not
guaranteed for the project until such taps are purchased
or a multi-year tap agreement has been executed between
the town and the developer.
(1) Sewage
treatment taps will be allocated according to a plan
developed by town staff that will assign the number of
taps and a time frame in which to use them.
(2) If public sewage treatment capacity is found to be
inadequate, preliminary subdivision and/or site plan
applications will be denied.
(3) Upon completion of construction of APFO sewage
treatment system improvements for a development, the
APFO sewer capacity approval shall be vested for the
capacity created by the improvements and shall not be
subject to further APFO sewage treatment capacity
testing unless the density or intensity of the
development increases.
(D)
Schools. Adequacy tests apply only to residential
development. APFO test data include:
(1) Adequacy of
every public school serving the proposed development
shall be determined using the most recent quarterly
enrollment data published by the Frederick County Public
Schools.
(2) Schools shall be considered adequate if the
enrollment for each school serving the development is
less than 100% of state-rated capacity during the entire
period for which APFO approval is granted by the
Planning Commission.
(3) Procedure. Town staff shall send a written request
to the Board of Education or its designee, requesting a
school adequacy test, and specifying:(a) the number of
years for which the development should be tested; (b)
the number and types of residential units to be tested;
and (c) data concerning the approved developments in the
school attendance areas that should be factored into the
test. The BOE or its designee shall forward its school
adequacy test results to town staff for presentation to
the Planning Commission. After consideration of the
school adequacy test results at a public meeting, the
Planning Commission shall determine whether the proposed
development meets the school adequacy requirements in
this chapter.
(4) Request to redistrict. If a school is not adequate
based on the BOE school adequacy test, and an adjoining
school district at the same level is at least 20% below
state rated capacity, then the applicant may request the
Frederick County Board of Education (BOE) to determine
the viability of redistricting to accommodate the new
development. If the BOE determines that redistricting is
a viable alternative, and the BOE approves a specific
redistricting plan that would result in all the schools
serving the proposed development meeting the standards
utilized to provide the BOE school adequacy test results
described in §40.04.140(3), then the schools shall be
considered adequate.
(5) Denial. If a school is not adequate and the BOE has
not approved a specific redistricting plan that would
result in the school meeting the BOE school adequacy
standards, then the preliminary subdivision or site plan
shall be denied, except as allowed for in §14.04.090.
(6) Mitigation. Improvements necessary to meet the
standards herein shall be determined by the Planning
Commission with the assistance of the Frederick County
Board of Education.
(7) Any BOE-required mitigation must be funded by the
developer
|