Biodiversity &
Land Use
Tim Iverson
(10/2019) When it comes to
financial management the old adage advises that you
diversify your assets. By spreading investments
individuals can protect themselves from losses. When it
comes to ecology and the environment the same advice rings
true.
The food we eat, the water we
drink, and the air we breathe all depend upon healthy and
diverse communities of plants and animals. Biological
diversity, or biodiversity, includes every living thing on
the planet at every level, from entire ecosystems all the
way down to genetics. It’s the myriad forms of life and
the countless ways they all interact with one another.
Just like financial assets the
diversity of our ecological assets insulate the planet and
everything on it from potential impacts and losses in
other sectors. A recent United Nations report on climate
change, released in July 2019, paints a troubling picture
for the climate at large. However, of particular note is a
stark decline in biodiversity and land use issues.
Environmentalists,
conservationists, and others would argue that biodiversity
has an inherent value that can’t necessarily be
quantified. However, biodiversity also has important
utilitarian value as well. There are environmental
services that are provided to humanity. Medicine, food,
climate regulation, water and nutrient cycling, carbon and
air purification, and countless other ways rich and
diverse ecosystems provide benefits to us and the world.
The dollar value of services provided is estimated in the
trillions, which is double the gross-domestic product
(GDP) of the entire world combined.
Forests are bastians of
biodiversity. The Amazon rainforest is the largest most
biologically diverse forest in the world. The amount of
life contained within is unparalleled. The tragedy of
their loss is unfolding in real-time. The significant loss
of diversity housed within is unsettling, but worse yet
are the tons of carbon dioxide (CO ) being thrown into the
atmosphere. Trees not only pull CO from the air and turn
it into breathable oxygen, they also lock it away keeping
it out of the atmosphere.
As greenhouse gases accumulate in
the atmosphere spurring climate change this can become a
vital tool for us. The US Forest Service estimates that
American forests store up to 750 million metric tons of CO
each year, which is about 10% of the country’s carbon
emissions. Carbon sequestration is a process where CO is
removed from the atmosphere and stored for an extended
period of time. The carbon is stored within the leaves,
stems, roots, and body of a tree.
Because trees live for so long
this banks the carbon potentially for hundreds of years.
Additionally, products made from wood will still contain
the carbon stored within extending the sequestration
period until that product either decomposes or is burned.
Scientists and policy makers are trying to figure out if
we can harness this ability of trees to slow or reverse
climate change. By not deforesting and reforesting areas
we can potentially bank excess CO for some time. Utilizing
carbon sequestration may not be the solution to the
climate change problem, but it may buy us some time.
Forests can help forestall
long-term climate change, but they also help to regulate
local climates and weather patterns too. Globally,
vegetative cover accounts for about 20-30% of total land.
Within forests or areas of vegetative cover plants release
water vapor and absorb and emit energy used to drive
weather. Forests create their own micro-climates with
leaves through transpiration, or evaporative cooling,
which reduces the humidity and temperature in the
surrounding area. As water vapor is evaporated back into
the air it condenses into clouds and eventually rain.
Livestock production is one of the
leading causes of land degradation, biodiversity loss,
pollution, and other climate change drivers. As forests,
both locally and globally, are razed for development or
livestock use (as is primarily the case for Amazonian
deforestation) we are curtailing the services and
biodiversity they provide. With a warming and drying
climate these are all the more valuable. Additionally,
land is a finite resource. We have all the land we will
ever have. It can’t simultaneously grow trees, house
people, and be farmed. As a society we need to seriously
consider how to allocate and maximize the way we use this
finite resource.
The single largest impact an
individual can have to affect climate change is to reduce
their meat consumption. By curtailing the production and
consumption of meat (especially red meat) a person can
dramatically lower their personal carbon and water
footprint. Even small commitments like sticking to a
single meat-free day per week or making the effort to
ensure one meal a day is completely meat-free go a long
way.
Additionally, by investing in
natural infrastructure we can double the impact of
ecological services. By investing in forested stream
buffers we improve fishing and water based recreation,
clean drinking water, improve the overall habitat and
capacity of the Chesapeake watershed, and restore
biodiverse ecosystems. The much decried "rain tax" in
Maryland was established to address these same issues by
managing stormwater flows. Flooding in Ellicott City has
cost taxpayers and the state millions. By effectively
utilizing natural and man-made infrastructure similar
catastrophes could be avoided in the future.
Biodiversity is the shield that
buffers any blows that disaster may bring. Large scale
ecosystem diversity allows for adjustments to fires and
floods. Plant and animal diversity means more types of
food and sustainability. Genetic diversity helps ward off
and resists the spread of disease. Over the long arc of
earth’s timeline there have been a total of five major
extinction events where nearly all biodiversity and life
were lost. Some researchers think we could be on the
precipice of a new sixth mass extinction event. With the
alarming loss of habitats and species combined with the
effects of a globally changing climate this could be the
case. It's likely too early to make a definitive call like
that, especially while our collective course could be
altered.
The bottom line is that a robust
and diverse ecosystem provides stability. Just as we seek
financial stability climatic patterns ought to be measured
and considered. The problem is real. The impact is real.
The solutions are not always easy. However, the pivot
towards actionable change must occur.
Read other articles by Tim Iverson