PeaceVoice
9/11, an
anniversary of unity or division?
Wim Laven
(9/10) The U.S. needs to make a
serious appraisal assessing our bridges—of unity—and
walls—of hate and division. What benefits, if any, are
provided by increasing isolationism? Do they outweigh the
blessings of collaboration, connection, and friendship?
Sadly, on this terrible
anniversary, I predict a showcase of divisive rhetoric
from a White House bent on tearing a country apart.
The world changed on September 11,
2001. The majority of my university students are not old
enough to have any memory of life before the terrorist
attacks. This creates a real challenge since I never want
to tell students how to think; my job is helping them
think for themselves. But there is truth: the white
supremacist and nationalist groups—that Trump refuses to
condemn—present the greatest threats for domestic
terrorism and violence; that Trump and his policies of
racism and xenophobia are used as recruitment tools by
groups like ISIS; that Trump’s words and ideology are
cited in manifestos and as motivation for hate crimes and
mass shootings in the U.S. and abroad; he has told more
than 12,000 lies as President…
In 2001 Americans were much more
connected. The tragedy brought people together—there was
compassion, charity, and empathy everywhere you looked.
There were isolated and heavily condemned acts of revenge
violence; those hateful acts did not show the American
character. Admittedly there was fear in the air; the myth
that having the largest military on earth guaranteed
safety and security had been decimated.
On September 11theveryone has the
chance to reflect on American leadership. Choosing to
listen with a fixed mindset will only act to confirm
preconceived notions. Alternatively, one can engage with a
growth mindset, by accepting and inviting dialogue. This
position allows revisiting thoughts and beliefs to when
improvements can be made. I tell students: "You get to
choose your mindset, you get to decide whether or not you
invite or refuse dialogue, but whatever you chose, and
whenever you choose it, I want you to take a second step.
Make an assessment of the mindset you chose. Did you
choose the right mindset for the situation?"
I do hope my predictions are
wrong. The world is burning, there are multiple disasters
and complex humanitarian emergencies, climate chaos
threatens life for future generations, etc. … strong
leadership and collaborative unity will be necessary just
to address natural disasters. If we cannot come together
in a coordinated and robust response in these cases, then
there is even less hope that we can come together for the
human-caused disasters, conflicts, and war.
The problem is that there are so
many examples of Trump sowing the seeds of division and
refusing to water the seeds of peace and opportunity. He
seems unable to free himself from his own ego. He is more
likely to double-down on his lie that he was "down there"
with the first responders, or to assert his wall would
have stopped it, than he is to acknowledge pain and
suffering. Empathy could bring people together but
bringing people together does not make the drama he wants.
He apparently had talks with the Taliban planned—ho
hum—and then dramatically cancelled. He couldn’t make it
to Poland—he instead dramatically cancelled to attend to
Hurricane Dorrian—and idiotically congratulated Polandon
being invaded by Nazis 80 years ago.
There may not be an opportunity
for Trump to reconcile with the Taliban. But he could
learn from Germany's President Frank-Walter Steinmeier,
who did make it to Poland. During a ceremony in the city
of Wielun, one of the first Nazi bombings on September 1,
1939, he said: "I stand before you, those who have
survived, before the descendants of the victims, the old
and the young residents of Wielun, I am humbled and
grateful. I bow to the victims of the attack in Wielun, I
pay tribute to the Polish victims of German tyranny and I
ask for forgiveness."
Perhaps, Trump could acknowledge
victims in ways that reflect their past and continued
suffering. He would also be well served to understand how
empathy fits into relationships. On December 7, 1970,
German Chancellor Willy Brandt’s simple action of falling
to his knees—Warsaw Genuflection (Kniefall von Warschau)—
during a visit to a monument to the Nazi-era Warsaw Ghetto
Uprising helped reunite the countries; it is likely a
reason he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1971. Rhetoric is a
starting point, then it needs to be matched with action
and policy.
Trump seems incapable of doing
much beyond stoking the flames of racial hatred and
pejorative animus. He just needs to spend time putting
those he is duty-bound to serve ahead of himself. The
bottom line: instead of addressing trauma and healing,
Trump will find an opportunity to make himself central ("I
am the Chosen One") he can exploit, again. Which lie will
it be? Will he talk about thousands of Muslims, again;
will he say he was there, again; will he again brag
aboutthe tallest building in New York (which he boasted
about right after the September 11 attacks 18 years ago,
though it was a lie). In all manner of suffering Trump
makes himself into the spectacle: he would run inunarmed
and stop the shooting (even with his draft-dodging bone
spursrevealed as a total hoax), he could save us, his
crowd size, the votes he received.
I credit him for the time he used
acue cardgiven to him by smarter staff when meeting with
school shooting victims, which read: "1. What would you
most want me to know about your experience?" And "5. I
hear you." At least he attempted empathy and validation.
My cue card has me expressing
empathy for Americans and the world as we suffer each day
of this non-ministering administration.
Wim Laven teaches political science and conflict resolution at Kennesaw State University, and is on the Governing Council of the
International Peace Research Association.