Thurmont and Emmitsburg
Officials Talk Local Effects
Ingrid Mezo
Officials from 157 municipalities
throughout the state introduced three different legislative
priorities they want state officials to address during an
annual Maryland Municipal League (MML) meeting at The Cozy
Restaurant in Thurmont. The priorities include increasing the
percentage of state aid to pay for police services, electric
aggregation, and giving municipalities the right to maintain
their own light fixtures, so they can save by using energy
efficient bulbs.
The State of Maryland used to pay for
10% of municipalities’ police costs, and now only pays 6.9%,
Thurmont Mayor and Frederick County MML Chapter President
Martin Burns said in an interview.
Thurmont Commissioner Wayne Hooper
said during a phone interview that MML members did not hear
much from state officials about increasing the amount of state
aid to municipalities because state officials did not have the
numbers available. But, Hooper said state officials told MML
members they would get back to them about that initiative.
"I don’t know the actual increase
Emmitsburg would receive, but I suspect not very much,"
Emmitsburg Mayor James Hoover said. "This legislation would be
more helpful to municipalities that have their own police
force.
But, I agree with the initiative."
In addition, Burns said that while
Thurmont, which has a separate power company contract unlike
many other municipalities throughout the state, would not
directly benefit from allowing the state municipalities to
place energy efficient bulbs in their street lamps, many of
the town’s neighbors in the county, especially Frederick City,
could realize a substantial savings.
"Our state law says you can’t get
within 10 feet of electric lines," Burns said. So, with the
current law on the books, electric companies can place the
least efficient bulbs into street lamps, then charge
municipalities the higher cost.
Hoover said this initiative would not
have much of an effect on Emmitsburg’s budget since most of
the town’s street lamps are only 10 feet tall, and not on
wooden poles, nowhere near power lines.
"There [are] no cost savings or
noticeable benefits that the town will receive or lose from
the initiative," he said. "We already maintain most of our
lights now."
The third proposal from municipal
leaders is one that could have far-reaching effects, but it is
unlikely to even come up for debate at the state level this
session. Hooper said state officials did not express much
optimism with regard to electrical aggregation.
"They said they were only one person,
but that they would make sure the committee chair is willing
to bring up [the issue] to the commission, because before,
they wouldn’t even do that…," Hooper said. "I think that’s
foolish because it’s a bill brought up, and it should at least
be heard."
Burns said that though Thurmont, along
with Front Royal, Williamsport, and Hagerstown has its own
electric contract, electric aggregation would be very
beneficial to town residents.
"If we were allowed to aggregate, we
could, for example, bring in Emmitsburg and other
municipalities throughout the state," Burns said. "Now we have
millions of people to buy a better rate. The more customers
you have, the more you can buy down the rate."
However, Burns said, "Nobody thinks
this will even get out of committee this year." Instead, he
said MML members were told state officials would spend a lot
of time "fixing the FCC."
Hoover said he did not like the
electric aggregation initiative because he would prefer it to
be an "opt-in" instead of an "opt-out."
"It is possible that some
municipalities will be able to save money in electric power,
but not all will be able to," Hoover said. "I don’t know if
Emmitsburg can save or [if it] will cost the residents more.
It’s a real gamble right now, as we do not know what’s going
to happen with our electric rates come January 2009."