Ingrid Mezo
Thurmont town superintendent Jim
Griever is looking into the town building its own power
generator to give the town more control over electric rates
for its residents.
Town residents in 2007 will continue
to see their electric bills go up, and recent power cost
adjustments have caused the rate to go up more than originally
anticipated—a total of 46 percent from April 2006 to January
2007— amounting to an average bill that costs $14.03 more than
last year, a spokesperson for Downes Associates, Inc., said
during a recent presentation to the town. Downes Associates is
the company the town hired to oversee its electric contract
with Allegheny Electric Supply (AES).
Thurmont is seeing these rate
increases earlier than other municipalities throughout
Frederick County and the state, due to rate caps in effect
until 2009 elsewhere that were placed there in an effort to
moderate the soaring power costs caused by deregulation of
power companies throughout the state. But, once those rate
caps come off, residents throughout the state will be hit
hard, Mayor Martin Burns has repeatedly said.
The Town of Thurmont, along with
Hagerstown, Front Royal, and Williamsport entered into a power
contract with AES for the next five years in an effort to
stabilize rising electric prices during periods of volatility
in the market.
Payment plans are available for
residents who are struggling, and the town is providing
materials to educate residents on how they can get tax credits
from the federal government and what they can do in their
homes to save energy.
Griever, who has been in the electric
business for 30 years, said de-regulation of power companies
in other states throughout the country has had the same effect
universally of increasing electric rates to residents.
Attempts at re-regulation, he said, have not helped either.
"It costs too much to get into the
business," he said during an interview. "Telemarketers were
trying to get into it and make money without risk, and it
didn’t work."
Efforts to cut costs to electric
companies, so that shareholders could still get their profits
despite the rate caps have created a dangerous situation
through out the state, Griever added. "There are trees way
above the 200 KV line on the beltway to Baltimore, and the
lines have burned holes through the trees," he said. "[If
trees were to fall on that line] it would make lights go out
all over Maryland, and West Virginia, and D.C. It would be a
mess."
Griever pointed to a 2001 heat wave in
Chicago in which 2,000 people died because the power went off.
In Spain and France, power outages caused the deaths of 6,000.
The problem with electricity, Griever
said, is "There is too much demand, and not enough
electricity, so they’re charging people when the prices go
up."
Griever, who spearheaded building a
power plant in Geneva, IL, where he was formerly employed, is
starting to work on a similar project in Thurmont. That will
involve determining what kind of generator would make the most
sense to build, conducting a cost benefit analysis to see if
it is worth building, and then town board members taking a
final vote on it.
"What it will amount to is revealing
the town’s options because the contract [with AES] expires in
four-and-a-half years," Griever said.
The biggest similarity between
Thurmont and Geneva, IL, is that there is a lack of
transmission capacity in the region, Griever added. This is a
problem in any areas around large metropolitan areas in the
United States. "And, even though Thurmont has that
transmission line going through the middle of it, the cost to
get the electricity to Thurmont is a very significant amount
of the electric bills
that residents pay every month," he
said.
Griever said he would look into all
five different methods to generate electricity, including
wind, solar, natural gas, fuel oil, and diesel.
"Not all of them would make sense, but
we’ll look at them anyway," he said. "Fuel cell technology has
come a long way in the last few years…We’ll investigate it,
and then once the type of generation is chosen, then a cost
benefit analysis looking over the next 20 or 30 years. You
determine your payback with any project of this size; you
determine if you move forward with it at that point. Number
one is feasibility, then cost benefit analysis, then you
decide at that point."
Burns, and Commissioners Wayne Hooper
and Ron Terpko have all expressed an interest in the project.
"This is something we would have to go
to Downes Associates for them to assist us with looking into
all this," Burns said. "We’ll see if it’s worth it, if oil
keeps going up…if it’s anticipated a cost savings is realized.
I’m always willing to look into anything."
Griever said he expects to have a
completed cost benefit analysis by the end of 2007.